Chapter 4 Modern Theories of Organizational Communication Expanding Your View Up to now, your introduction to organizational communication has been fairly straightforward. In this chapter, however, we are going to complicate these pictures. For example, has your boss ever yelled at you?
Universities The organizational structures of American colleges and universities vary distinctly, depending on institutional type, culture, and history, yet they also share much in common.
While a private liberal arts college may have a large board of trustees, and a public research university nested in a state system no trustees of its own, the vast majority of public and private universities are overseen by an institutional or system-wide governing board. This somewhat paradoxical combination of distinctiveness and uniformity reflects the unique characteristics of individual colleges and universities, and the shared-task environment including strategic planning, fiscal oversight, curriculum planning, and student affairs common to American postsecondary institutions.
Scholars of higher education view many aspects of private colleges and universities as significantly different than public universities. Yet the reliance on bureaucratic organizational structures and the belief in research, advanced instruction, and service at both types of institutions shape many aspects of public and private university governance structures in a fairly uniform manner.
The organizational structure of colleges and universities is an important guide to institutional activity, but not the only one. Scholars of higher education have developed a variety of multi-dimensional models of organizational behavior that also shed considerable light on college and university structure and process.
Multi-dimensional models seek to explain organizational behavior across institutional types, and in various institutional activities. The models vary somewhat in the number of dimensions incorporated, from J.
These models are quite helpful in thinking about organizational structure and process within colleges and universities. The same institution may evidence a bureaucratic, hierarchical decision-making process in its central administration, and a collegial process in its academic senate.
It is a combination of organizational structure and process that shapes college and university behavior. Public and private colleges and universities of all types incorporate key authority structures, including a governing board, a president or chancellor, a cohort of administrative leaders, and an academic senate.
In public institutions these core organizational entities collaborate with such external authorities as state and federal political leaders, community organizations, and members of the public, as well as business interests and philanthropic foundations. The degree of uniformity in private and public college and university organizational structures has been shaped by the nature of demands on the postsecondary system since the mid-twentieth century.
In then-president of the University of California system, Clark Kerr, described the postwar American university as a multiversity. The term captured the increasingly complex organizational and governance structures required to negotiate its ever-expanding task environment.
The authority of the governing board is vested in it by the state wherein the school resides or, particularly in the case of older, private institutions, by legally binding royal or colonial charters. Both public and private governing boards are generally constituted of citizen trustees.
In the public case those trustees are often political appointees who serve as a fundamental link between the institution and state and national political structures.
In the United States the tradition of lay oversight of colleges and universities can be traced to the founding of Harvard College in Subsequent private colleges adopted this form of governance, which the U.
Supreme Court deemed constitutional in its Dartmouth College decision of Public colleges and universities followed suit, although on the public side the role of governors in trustee appointments and the key role of legislative funding in institutional development has meant that the states play a central role in the governance of the institutions.
The federal government has influenced the organization of higher education primarily through legislation—the Morrill Acts, the Higher Education Acts, and the G. Bill, for instance—that reinforced decentralized governance and, hence, the authority of institutional governing boards at both public and private institutions.
As John Millet noted, "It has long been evident that it is the state governments rather than the federal government that carry the primary authority and responsibility for higher education in the United States" p.
Governing board members at public institutions typically arrive at the trustee table by one of four paths:Local and Interstate Moving. Fastway Movers NYC, New Jersey, Boston & Miami have the best options for your residential move. Fastwayâ€™s recipe for a stress-free move includes the following ingredients: the latest packing materials, trained personnel, an organizational team, experience, and responsibility.
The organizational structures of American colleges and universities vary distinctly, depending on institutional type, culture, and history, yet they also share much in common. PART 3 | Organ IzIng DEfining ORgAnizATiOnAL STRUCTURE No other topic in management has undergone as much change in the past few years as that of organizing and organizational structure.
JSTOR is a digital library of academic journals, books, and primary sources. 1. This is a book about the organization of science and technology in eighteenth-century Europe, about the relationships of each to the other and to .
Questions on Organizational Behavior. Prepared by Dr.
Stephen Hartman, School of Management, New York Institute of Technology. 1. How have American companies suffered in recent years?